Wednesday, November 08, 2017

Proposal: Magnum Opus

Times out, 4-2. Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 10 Nov 2017 11:54:58 UTC

If “Codices” exists as a rule, add to it:

The following letter draft is suspected to be made by M. Opus, Archphilosopher Primo of the New Order and is considered ruletext:

Gee-whiz, Seddy, things have been crazy lately huh? Man. I don’t know how I did this, but there’s like crazy meta-meta-metaphysical arcanopotential in the loopgrinder of sizzleslash. Yeah, I know, crazy. Now, I’m not entirely sure this will work for you all the time (it has like, eh, 10% success rate?), but I’ll let you all know just in case you want to try pulling it off.

If you’ve got like, eight of the same kind of shard, which isn’t of the kind you’re attuned to - you know, your affinity - you can use any spell. Any spell. Yep. But you’ve got to lose all of them in the process, but hey, if it works, it works. Oh, and if you fail, your Power kind of becomes, well. Null. Zero. Nada. I guess you can figure out from that why I’m retiring.

So, how are the children? Last I heard, little *smudge* -s already tessering his fir- *smudge*

The rest of the letter has been lost to the ages.

Comments

Axemabaro:

11-08-2017 12:42:44 UTC

for

Axemabaro:

11-08-2017 12:44:59 UTC

for

Diabecko:

11-08-2017 14:03:51 UTC

for

derrick:

11-08-2017 14:19:35 UTC

Could we avoid putting rule text in the Codices?

card:

11-08-2017 14:55:12 UTC

we could but probably won’t for

pokes:

11-08-2017 17:42:42 UTC

against maybe with a more explicit interpretation outside the quote. Does “like 10% success” mean I can roll DICE7 and call it a success on 1?

Trigon:

11-08-2017 20:53:27 UTC

against per pokes