Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Proposal: Make the secrecy policy explicit

Reached quorum at 9-1 ~ southpointingchariot

Adminned at 22 Mar 2012 20:15:23 UTC

In the rule “Cycle Resolution”, insert this paragraph before the paragraph starting with “Then, players Restock”:

The Net should announce which Players Influenced which Institutions, but not how any Players specifically Directed their Resources.

Comments

southpointingchariot:

21-03-2012 05:44:01 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

21-03-2012 07:13:05 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

21-03-2012 10:36:41 UTC

for

ChronosPhaenon:

21-03-2012 11:48:14 UTC

for

scshunt:

21-03-2012 11:54:59 UTC

for

Patrick:

21-03-2012 12:27:48 UTC

for

southpointingchariot:

21-03-2012 13:56:52 UTC

I would just point out that winning directions may likely be deducible from the GNDT.

Murphy:

21-03-2012 14:11:25 UTC

for

Cpt_Koen:

21-03-2012 16:16:57 UTC

for
If something is deducible from the gndt, then it’s not a secret, and if something’s not a secret, we shouldn’t have to spend hours sorting the logs to find it.

southpointingchariot:

21-03-2012 16:26:31 UTC

@koen, agreed - my point was that there is something out there that can still be figured out by sifting through the gndt that is not openly published.

Cpt_Koen:

21-03-2012 16:29:41 UTC

Oh, right, I misread the Proposal. I thought the winning directions would be the only ones revealed.

southpointingchariot:

21-03-2012 16:52:26 UTC

Yeah, this reveals a lot more than I was planning on posting - though i suppose with the credit income, it’s probably a good idea. But it still doesn’t say what the winning directions were; I may decide to post those as well.

Doctor29:

22-03-2012 01:02:51 UTC

imperial

Bucky:

23-03-2012 02:28:46 UTC

against , both to help us catch mistakes and because I think full open information is a better idea.