Thursday, October 05, 2017

Proposal: Meta Deferential [Special Case]

Reached against quorum 2-4 failed by card

Adminned at 07 Oct 2017 03:04:25 UTC

Create a Rule named “Majority Defferentials” In Special Case:

If the King has voted DEFERENTIAL on a proposal or if there is no King (such as in a metadynasty), that vote is instead considered to be valid and either FOR (if more players have voted FOR the proposal than have voted AGAINST it) or AGAINST (in all other cases).

Set this new rule “Majority Defferentials” to “Active”

 

Comments

Axemabaro:

10-05-2017 19:09:17 UTC

for

pokes:

10-05-2017 19:21:21 UTC

against since it encourages lazy voting.

Also: “King has voted” -> “King has not voted” ?

derrick:

10-05-2017 20:03:37 UTC

No, the majority doesn’t kick in unless the King votes deferential.

card:

10-05-2017 20:37:41 UTC

imperial

card:

10-06-2017 17:51:58 UTC

against CoV

Trigon:

10-06-2017 21:08:14 UTC

for

Axemabaro:

10-06-2017 23:02:57 UTC

against

Darknight:

10-07-2017 01:50:40 UTC

against