Thursday, August 04, 2005

Proposal: Metaantiproposal

Timed out, 1-5. —75th Trombone on 6 aug at 22:22 GMT
Actually 2-5—Excalabur

Adminned at 07 Aug 2005 10:38:10 UTC

If “Theme Anyone?” passed, deduct B$20 from 75th Trombone’s total for carelessly changing the core ruleset without properly notifying players.

If more than half the votes on this proposal are accompanied by the text “Revert,” change the first paragraph of Rule 3 to read

Any Disciple may propose a change to the Ruleset or gamestate by posting an entry with the subject “Proposal : [Title]” (where [Title] is a title of eir choosing), and describes the changes e wishs to be made.

posted by 75th Trombone at 04 Aug 2005 21:31:08 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Rodney:

04-08-2005 23:19:55 UTC

for Revert. I’m not sure if the last one got through. I still think that the modification wasn’t legal, so it is still the old “Proposal: [[Title]]” Format.

Excalabur:

05-08-2005 00:34:14 UTC

heh.  there’s about 10 or 12 changes to the ruleset: this isn’t the only one.  see my post about three below this one inviting CfJs if any objections should be raised.  against

ChronosPhaenon:

05-08-2005 01:31:19 UTC

against Still not working without text.

Cosmologicon:

05-08-2005 02:01:49 UTC

against Huh, the preview shows up okay without text but not the submit.

Shadowclaw:

05-08-2005 09:52:28 UTC

against
At this rate, we’ll end up bickering over implementation changes forever.

TAE:

05-08-2005 12:22:20 UTC

against

smith:

06-08-2005 00:58:07 UTC

:DEFERENTIAL:

Excalabur:

06-08-2005 02:57:49 UTC

i think it’s “IMPERIAL” and “SEAL” for def and veto, for some reason.

we can double-book them, though.

Seventy-Fifth Trombone:

06-08-2005 08:10:58 UTC

“i think it’s ‘IMPERIAL’ and ‘SEAL’ for def and veto, for some reason.”

I was trying to duplicate the smiley names at Backblog, but I obviously wasn’t paying enough attention, because I only got “IMPERIAL” correct.  ;P