Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Proposal: [MIC] to Which rule are you refering to? v2.0

Timed out, More FOR than AGAINST
-Amnistar

Adminned at 31 Dec 2008 20:13:32 UTC

Create a new subrule of rule 3.1 Proper Reasoning, subrule of rule 3.0 Needless Bureaucracy, rule of the MIC ruleset, named “Proper References” with the text:

WHEREAS it is oftentimes confusing which rule a Citizen is refering to;
WHEREAS said confusion can be eliminated by proper reference;
THEREFOR any reference to the rules of the MIC ruleset within the Ruleset, or within a MIC proposal, must include the full rule name and number, as well as any rules of which that rule is a subrule of.

See my reference in this proposal for what I’m aiming at.

posted by Amnistar at 30 Dec 2008 02:56:01 UTC Comments (6)

Comments

Sgeo:

30-12-2008 05:01:23 UTC

for

Escher:

30-12-2008 14:19:21 UTC

for Only because it is a perfect example of needless bureaucracy.

SingularByte: he/him

30-12-2008 20:34:45 UTC

for

Oze:

30-12-2008 21:06:16 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

31-12-2008 16:03:45 UTC

for

Klisz:

01-01-2009 01:24:03 UTC

This has reached quorum within MIC. (The “Quorum issues, and voting issues” proposal hasn’t passed yet.)