Call for Judgment: Miscounting Votes
Times out at 3-4.
-Purplebeard
Adminned at 24 Mar 2008 14:14:03 UTC
I think that the votes for the proposal Calcite Milking Gloves were not counted correctly. In particular, the bit of rule 1.4 Voting which states “If a Captain casts more than one Vote on a Proposal, only the most recent of those Votes is counted.” seems to have been ignored.
By my count there were unique 11 votes For the proposal (counting Logan’s implicit For vote), and 0 votes Against (as Chivalrybean changed eir vote to For). Of these, 6 included the text “Milking is tough”, which would be a majority of the votes, correct? Therefore, the Horses rule should be amended as delineated in the proposal.
Yarrr! I have to agree that there was a miscount. Should be 11-0. About the amendment: I believe it comes down to whether alethiophile’s “milking is tough” should be counted since it was not in his official vote’s comment. I am in favor of counting it.
Alethiophile’s vote technically didn’t include ‘milking is tough’, even if he meant it to.
Yoda:
I admit that I missed Chivalrybean’s COV, but alethiophile’s “Milking is tough” vote did not count because the text was not included with a vote.
