Sunday, February 01, 2015

Proposal: Mob Juices [Demand]

Uh, does this count as being adminned by Kevan? Updated to vetoed by Brendan.

(No, it’s like any other veto; I vote “veto” and when the queue gets to it, the proposal fails.—Kevan)

Adminned at 02 Feb 2015 08:41:20 UTC

If Proposal: Mob Justice fails, this proposal does nothing.

Replace the subroutine ARLK with the following:

ARLK - Threshold: 10 OI. All effects of this subroutine need to be Countersigned. The Subject of this subroutine is given the Injured Condition. If its Subject is already Injured, their Condition is instead changed to Disabled. If its subject is already Disabled, this subroutine has no effect.


Josh: he/they

01-02-2015 17:12:27 UTC

This proposal does nothing as Mob Justice has already failed.

Brendan: he/him

01-02-2015 17:58:13 UTC

against anyway.


01-02-2015 19:45:03 UTC

for  (currently tied 1-1, doesn’t matter, voting this way to capture DEFs)

I think it’s about time to discard our policy of always voting against demands.

Kevan: City he/him

01-02-2015 22:44:13 UTC

veto Sabotaged.