BlogNomic: More Stunt Changes

Friday, February 13, 2009

Proposal: More Stunt Changes

It is important to recognize that some individuals may excell as certain tasks more than others, and that certain actions might be benefeicial to repeat. This proposal discourages the repetition of actions known to work.

That is all.

General Amnistar

Adminned at 14 Feb 2009 12:44:14 UTC

Add the following text to rule 2.6

“When a soldier has used a stunt, he may not use that stunt again in the same skirmish. If a soldier has used a stunt which lists death as a prerequisite, he may not use any other stunts which list death as a prerequisite during the same skirmish.”

Don’t you hate making a proposal then realising there’s other parts you could add? This proposal stops people from finding a powerful exploit in the stunts and using it repeatedly.

Comments

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 20:01:12 UTC

I’m not sure. It closes a loophole, yes, but it also makes it impossible for someone to do a ‘simple’ stunt often. Like dual weield, or some such.

Klisz:

13-02-2009 20:10:56 UTC

Qwazukee:

13-02-2009 20:16:59 UTC

, I hope Amni will resolve this vote at some point.

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 20:26:23 UTC

Nope, just for that, I’m not. Qwaz, go make up your own mind.

Kevan: he/him

13-02-2009 21:45:16 UTC

Good to close a loophole, but a shame to prevent role specialisation. The AP cost should already keep stunts fairly rare; we just need to be very careful about adding potentially recursive stunts.