Friday, February 13, 2009

Proposal: More Stunt Changes

It is important to recognize that some individuals may excell as certain tasks more than others, and that certain actions might be benefeicial to repeat.  This proposal discourages the repetition of actions known to work.

That is all.

General Amnistar

Adminned at 14 Feb 2009 12:44:14 UTC

Add the following text to rule 2.6

“When a soldier has used a stunt, he may not use that stunt again in the same skirmish. If a soldier has used a stunt which lists death as a prerequisite, he may not use any other stunts which list death as a prerequisite during the same skirmish.”

Don’t you hate making a proposal then realising there’s other parts you could add? This proposal stops people from finding a powerful exploit in the stunts and using it repeatedly.

Comments

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 20:01:12 UTC

imperial I’m not sure.  It closes a loophole, yes, but it also makes it impossible for someone to do a ‘simple’ stunt often.  Like dual weield, or some such.

Klisz:

13-02-2009 20:10:56 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

13-02-2009 20:16:59 UTC

imperial , I hope Amni will resolve this vote at some point.

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 20:26:23 UTC

Nope, just for that, I’m not.  Qwaz, go make up your own mind.

Devenger:

13-02-2009 20:40:20 UTC

against nah

Qwazukee:

13-02-2009 20:41:39 UTC

Ok,  against

ais523:

13-02-2009 20:45:51 UTC

imperial so I can be safe in the knowledge that my vote won’t count.

Kevan: he/him

13-02-2009 21:45:16 UTC

against Good to close a loophole, but a shame to prevent role specialisation. The AP cost should already keep stunts fairly rare; we just need to be very careful about adding potentially recursive stunts.

Hix:

13-02-2009 22:30:07 UTC

against

Sparrow:

13-02-2009 22:54:40 UTC

against

TrumanCapote:

13-02-2009 23:03:41 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

14-02-2009 04:32:57 UTC

against

Igthorn:

14-02-2009 09:12:06 UTC

against

SingularByte: he/him

14-02-2009 16:10:15 UTC

against SK and request for a veto. I want massive collateral damage.

Amnistar: he/him

14-02-2009 20:43:03 UTC

veto BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM