Sunday, October 30, 2011

Proposal: More Votable Matter Cleanup

Passes 13-0

Enacted by Clucky

Adminned at 01 Nov 2011 15:58:20 UTC

Rewrite the Appendix entry “Resolve/Resolution” so it reads:

If used in a context of a Votable Matter, the world “Resolve” means to perform the act, as an Admin, of enacting or failing a a Votable Matter. The world “Resolution” means then the act of doing so. If used in any other context, the meaning of both “Resolve” and “Resolution” is the standard English meaning of these words.

In the Rule “Votable Matters”, substitute “marks a Votable Matter as enacted or failed,” with “resolves a Votable Matter”.

In the Appendix Rule “Gamestate Tracking”, substitute the first occurrence of “Proposals, Calls for Judgment,” with “Votable Matters”

In the Appendix Rule “Gamestate Tracking”, substitute “Proposals, Calls for Judgment, Declaration of Victory,” with “Votable Matters”

In the Appendix Rule “Rules and Proposals”, substitute

Rules which trigger upon the Enactment or Failure of a Proposal are the responsibility of the Admin who Enacts or Fails it.

with

Rules which trigger upon the Resolution of a Votable Matter are the responsibility of the Admin who Resolves it.

If more than half the EVCs on this Proposal contain the phrase “Leave them Alone”, the following changes shall not be enacted.

Ammend the Appendix entry “Core Proposal” so it reads

A Proposal which mandates changes that, even if conditionally, are limited to the creation, deletion, and/or amendment of core rules and/or the glossary, and/or renaming, banning, and/or the granting or removing of admin status from one or more Players.

Ammend the Appendix entry ” Dynastic Proposal ” so it reads

A Proposal which mandates changes that, even if conditionally, are limited to the creation, deletion, and/or amendment of dynastic rules and/or gamestate defined by dynastic rules.

 

Again, mostly shifting things around.

Comments

omd:

30-10-2011 20:50:02 UTC

against

ChronosPhaenon:

30-10-2011 21:04:56 UTC

comex, would you please tell the reason you are against? No problem with the fact per se, but I’m trying to clean-up the ruleset and any inputs on the matter would be nice.

Amnistar: he/him

30-10-2011 21:16:25 UTC

for Because you’re not repping him I assume.

ChronosPhaenon:

30-10-2011 21:22:05 UTC

I’m repping no-one, this is a core proposal, and cannot rep.

arthexis: he/him

30-10-2011 22:29:31 UTC

for

omd:

30-10-2011 23:10:45 UTC

Actually, I have no idea why I voted against. :p for

scshunt:

31-10-2011 03:20:58 UTC

for

Bucky:

31-10-2011 03:21:27 UTC

for .

Spitemaster:

31-10-2011 04:33:40 UTC

for

Prince Anduril:

31-10-2011 07:56:54 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

31-10-2011 08:35:47 UTC

for

Pavitra:

31-10-2011 16:37:24 UTC

for

lazerchik:

01-11-2011 02:57:08 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

01-11-2011 04:54:11 UTC

for

eelpout:

01-11-2011 19:45:41 UTC

for