There’s an unnecessary amount of revoking in the second clause of this - in the mildest case other players’ game actions between now and this CfJ’s enaction will be undone, which seems unfair; under a slightly stronger reading, this CfJ itself will be undone. And with a dedicatedly perverse reading of “since the first illegal action having happened”, we’ll be winding the game back a decade or more.

You can move again in five hours’ time anyway. And really, your being in a location (the Market) where you can’t take an action because you lack the resources isn’t very different from being in a location (the Forest) where you can’t take an action because you already took it there today. This CfJ could actually give you a free extra move for Thursday, if it took more than five hours to resolve.

I doubt the “since the first illegal action having happened” *reading* would pass though, because of consensus reality (it could though, just unlikely because I suspect people would likely just choose the reading that is most convenient to them, which is the more tame interpretation).

But yeah, on my behalf

Not opposed to take-baksies in principle, but I think making mistaken and/or illegal moves in Blognomic and ending up in the wrong place at the wrong time is part of the game. I made a similar UTC blunder earlier in the game which significantly increased my risk of an untimely death. :)