Monday, March 02, 2015

Proposal: Multiplication or Concatenation?

Self-killed. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 02 Mar 2015 18:29:51 UTC

If a Quorum of the subset of Townspersons that vote For this Proposal have the word “multiplication” in the comment that has their EVC, then in the Rule “Vocabulary”, create a new bullet point in the list in that rule and have it contain the following text:-

Any consecutive string of variables (such as XY or XYZ) is considered to be the product of those variables.

If a Quorum of the subset of Townspersons that vote For this Proposal have the word “concatenation” in the comment that has their EVC, then in the Rule “Vocabulary”, create a new bullet point in the list in that rule and have it contain the following text:-

Any consecutive string of single-digit variables (such as XY or XYZ) is considered to be the number that would have those variables as digits in the order that those variables appear.

Decide amongst yourselves…

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

02-03-2015 16:57:20 UTC

against I can’t really vote FOR this as I have no idea what outcome I’m going to end up with. Maybe this should be two separate proposals? It doesn’t really matter to me what the outcome is, so long as we pick one - but either way, if it’s important, it should probably go into the Glossary rather than the Dynastic Rules.

Kevan: he/him

02-03-2015 17:06:18 UTC

against Per Josh. Would also potentially take only one comedy voter to end up with both bullet points enacting.

Ely:

02-03-2015 17:17:24 UTC

against

ayesdeeef:

02-03-2015 18:21:24 UTC

against ok, I thought I put a clause in their that says when the second clause triggers, if the first sentence exists, remove it first, but I guess I forgot.