Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Call for Judgment: Mutiny

timed out, final vote 0-1-8—Yoda

Adminned at 15 Mar 2008 10:58:32 UTC

09/03 22:07 (UTC) - Purplebeard
  Jack’s Gold = 65 (was 83)
(I don’t believe your proposal qualifies as a limerick. CfJ if you disagree.)

1) I have changed it back.  If Purplebeard disagrees with THAT change, he can raise a CfJ.
2) This CfJ is to reinforce my interpretation that Bort is a limerick.  If this does not pass, I will change it back.

Comments

Jack:

11-03-2008 13:35:36 UTC

aaronwinborn:

11-03-2008 14:51:42 UTC

imperial

the meter is lost,
but the rhyming is as clear
as pirate Bort’s wart.

spikebrennan:

11-03-2008 15:03:01 UTC

A lim’rick’s not merely a rhyme
But also observance of time.
In other words, meter.
Jack, that’ll defeat-er.
I wish you more luck, then, next time.  [damn]


against

LykeX:

11-03-2008 15:52:53 UTC

The meter is essential, so against

Purplebeard:

11-03-2008 18:46:17 UTC

I consider it bad form of you to un-undo your action in such a way. Rule 1.7 clearly defines the proper way of handling this:

“All updates to the GNDT are logged - if a Captain feels that an alteration goes against the Rules (as they were at the time of the alteration), he may simply undo the effects of that alteration. If such an undoing is disputed, a Call for Judgment shall be raised.”

You should have posted a CfJ disputing my change instead of reverting it and asking for permission after the act.

against For the reasons stated above, and also because this CfJ doesn’t do anything. Also, I hunbly suggest you revert your change, and post a real CfJ if you still disagree about mine.

Yoda:

11-03-2008 20:14:32 UTC

against Although I think the rule should be a bit more loose as far as the definition of “a proposal in the form” of haikus or limericks.

Darknight: he/him

11-03-2008 21:17:36 UTC

against

Chivalrybean:

11-03-2008 23:54:49 UTC

against

Lugosh:

12-03-2008 19:03:24 UTC

against

Tekneek:

13-03-2008 12:56:34 UTC

against