4-7, cannot reach quorum w/o CoV. Failed by Excalabur.
Adminned at 05 Dec 2005 14:47:54 UTC
Move rule 4 to the ‘impulses’ section of the rules, and name it “The fortress of cheese”
For the remainder of this dynasty, consider the sentence defining the three types of rules as exclusive, not permissive.
Can the second sentence of this proposal have a continual effect? It doesn’t add anything to the ruleset. Rewrite and I will vote for.
And the answer is ‘yes’. Proposals can do anything they’re not specifically disallowed from doing.
See: the famous cheese proposal. Moonwryn, I assume you have a link to it?
http://blognomic.blogspot.com/2004/10/proposal-east-of-east-st-louis.html
I’d like to point out that in my greatest, last, and most utterly illegal act as Emperor I enacted that proposal.
Can’t we just put a sentence in the law stating that rules are impulsses by default
Yes, but did it have a continual game effect _after_ its passing? There’s nothing that says we have to obey old proposals. We need only obey the ruleset.
I think a proposal can have a continual effect which isn’t tracked, but is still part of the gamestate, but this is bad form. boo, Excalabur.
thank you for immortalising my immortal proposal which is still in effect, i believe
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
I like it.
Quazie: