Thursday, November 25, 2021

Proposal: No More Betrayal Clause

Vetoed by Brendan, as there is no longer a dynastic rule by this name.

Adminned at 26 Nov 2021 23:21:23 UTC

Change “Quorum Tiebreaker” to read:

While at least two teams have multiple members, the author of a Votable Matter cannot be considered to have voted FOR on that Votable Matter.

Simultaneously addressing the issue that is raised by, which would allow one incoming player to join team “Enhancement Talent” and negate the Tiebreaker.



25-11-2021 05:13:54 UTC



25-11-2021 05:14:28 UTC

Oh dear! I’m sorry! I forgot to wait!


25-11-2021 05:43:39 UTC

No problem. I can always repropose if there’s a serious problem with the current version.

lemon: she/her

25-11-2021 06:09:22 UTC


Kevan: he/him

25-11-2021 08:51:44 UTC


Brendan: Dark One he/him

26-11-2021 23:20:55 UTC

veto I think I can veto this, despite “Malign Emperors” saying “The Dark One may not cast a vote of VETO on any Proposal whose effect is limited to the dynastic rules or gamestate”—there is no longer a dynastic rule called “Quorum Tiebreaker.”