Thursday, November 25, 2021

Proposal: No More Betrayal Clause

Vetoed by Brendan, as there is no longer a dynastic rule by this name.

Adminned at 26 Nov 2021 23:21:23 UTC

Change “Quorum Tiebreaker” to read:

While at least two teams have multiple members, the author of a Votable Matter cannot be considered to have voted FOR on that Votable Matter.

Simultaneously addressing the issue that is raised by https://blognomic.com/archive/drive_the_wedge, which would allow one incoming player to join team “Enhancement Talent” and negate the Tiebreaker.

Comments

Silverwing:

25-11-2021 05:13:54 UTC

against

Silverwing:

25-11-2021 05:14:28 UTC

Oh dear! I’m sorry! I forgot to wait!

TyGuy6:

25-11-2021 05:43:39 UTC

No problem. I can always repropose if there’s a serious problem with the current version.

lemon: she/her

25-11-2021 06:09:22 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

25-11-2021 08:51:44 UTC

for

Brendan: Dark One he/him

26-11-2021 23:20:55 UTC

veto I think I can veto this, despite “Malign Emperors” saying “The Dark One may not cast a vote of VETO on any Proposal whose effect is limited to the dynastic rules or gamestate”—there is no longer a dynastic rule called “Quorum Tiebreaker.”