Proposal: No More Camels
Fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed 2 votes to 7 by Kevan.
Adminned at 08 Aug 2021 10:43:34 UTC
In the sentence “An official post may be altered by its author if it is less than 4 hours old and either no General has commented on it or (if it is a Votable Matter) if all comments on it contain no voting icons; otherwise this can only be done as allowed by the Ruleset” in the Appendix, remove ‘it is less than 4 hours old and either’ and ‘or (if it is a Votable Matter) if all comments on it contain no voting icons’.
The current rule is a camel; 4 hours pleases nobody.
I think that the edit window should be long - essentially a separate phase of a proposal’s existence. But that isn’t popular, so my second choice is that it’s gone. We have other methods for seeking community feedback on ideas - chat rooms, drafts on the wiki - and other mechanisms for fixing typos.
The edit window creates the illusion that every player gets to input on an idea before it gets voted on. They don’t; only the proposer does. If their idea passes, other players can amend it. If it fails, they can fix it and repropose it. The tyranny of the edit window forces players to may too much attention to this game, and removes the sting from the voting window: the appropriate time to feed back on a proposal is over the course of the 48 hours that follow it being posted, and everyone should get to do it, not just those who disturbed their sleep enough to clap eyes on it early.
lemon: she/her
i think this is a good idea overall, but i object to it as a player who benefits from seeing my proposals on the page, & will often post and then do 1-3 little edits in the 10m following the proposal’s posting. i’d appreciate a 15-minute no-comment window at bare minimum, to match the window on changing post categories