Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Proposal: No need for exact figures

Passes 6-2—arth

Adminned at 16 Sep 2009 23:25:39 UTC

In subrule 2.2.2 “Stamina”, replace

Each Survivor has a Number called Stamina, which shall be an integer less than or equal to 20, which is tracked in the GNDT and initially 10. When a Healthy Survivor’s Stamina becomes 0, they take damage. When a Wounded Survivor’s Stamina becomes -10, they take damage.

with

Each Survivor has a Number called Stamina, which shall be an integer less than or equal to 20, which is tracked in the GNDT and initially 10. Whenever a Healthy Survivor’s Stamina is 0 or lower, anyone can make that Survivor take damage. Whenever a Wounded Survivor’s Stamina is -10 or less, anyone can make that Survivor take damage.

If a rule or subrule called “Faction Victory” exists, replace

If the Food and Water statistic is ever equal to 100

with

If the Food and Water statistic is ever 100 or greater

Because it’s stupid that people get damaged at 0 but not -1. Likewise, for a Food and Water victory.

Comments

arthexis:

09-15-2009 04:17:37 UTC

for  for  for  for  for

Qwazukee:

09-15-2009 05:16:53 UTC

against Due to the possible effects of continuously taking damage (aka, someone’s Stamina is still below -10 after they take damage so they take it again, etc.).

ais523:

09-15-2009 09:53:43 UTC

@Qwaz: I thought of that; it doesn’t happen because taking damage changes the Status, so the condition (being Healthy /and/ below 0) no longer applies, as the person in question is no longer Healthy.

spikebrennan:

09-15-2009 13:40:09 UTC

against
per quaz

Qwazukee:

09-15-2009 16:16:10 UTC

I don’t care enough to examine this closely, but just be aware that arth will probably game this into oblivion, and good for him.

Bucky:

09-15-2009 17:25:18 UTC

for

Klisz:

09-15-2009 17:31:02 UTC

against  for now, I need to think this out. I do not want arth to win when he’s had a dynasty so recently.

Qwazukee:

09-15-2009 18:41:49 UTC

Psh, 6 dynasties ago isn’t recently. Remember how Kevan’s 2nd and 3rd Dynasties were only separated by 1 dynasty in between?

Oze:

09-15-2009 19:08:40 UTC

for  for  for

Ienpw III:

09-15-2009 19:46:00 UTC

for?

Klisz:

09-15-2009 19:59:24 UTC

@Qwaz: Was it really 6 dynasties? Hmmm… I still don’t want arth to win when we’re still in this dynasty’s early stages, though.

Klisz:

09-15-2009 20:00:10 UTC

Actually, CoV for

arthexis:

09-16-2009 03:31:34 UTC

Early stages? More like boring stages actually.

Darknight:

09-17-2009 00:47:53 UTC

imperial