Wednesday, October 02, 2024

Proposal: No Zig Zag

Timed out, 2-1. Enacted by JonathanDark. Has no effect because there is no thing labeled “Turn Slice”.

Adminned at 04 Oct 2024 04:01:01 UTC

In “Turn Slice” after

Two cells are diagonally adjacent if both their row numbers and their column numbers differ by 1.

with

In order to be unbroken, the cells must be in the same direction—i.e. if there are N cells in the group two cells whose row numbers and their column numbers differ by N-1 such that all the cells in the group form a diagonal line

trying to patch a hole in Diagonal Slice where you could do like a zig-zag pattern of something like {1,2}, {2,3}, {3,2}, {4,3}, {5,2} and that would technically fit “Diagonal Slice” but I don’t think match the spirit of what the rule is going for

Comments

JonathanDark: he/him

02-10-2024 17:26:59 UTC

for

Lukas:

02-10-2024 19:15:23 UTC

against There’s something weird going on with the grammar in the added text; while the intent is clear, I can’t really parse what it’s actually saying.

I also don’t mind being able to zig-zag, though I do acknowledge that there’s some bias here as I’m the one with the most Kiwis.