And I assume this is tacit acceptance of it being okay for Wakukee to have added the “He does this by rolling DICEX in the GNDT” stuff in the first place, when the Your New Home proposal erroneously said only to add the following “sentence”.

(as I read the rules, unlike with a proposal, I am not presumed to have voted in favor of this merely by remaining silent).  @Kevan: I figured that I didn’t need to take a position on that; either Wakukee was correct in adminning the original proposal or “Secure Beneath the Watchful Eyes” fixed the problem.  The ruleset looks the same now regardless.

Actually, Wakukee took a fair but different interpretation of “previous rule” (it was meant as “the rule created previously by this proposal”, but he took it as “the rule previous in the ruleset to the one created by this proposal), so Secure Beneath wouldn’t have fixed the problem, as it was expecting to find the sentence in a different rule.

Kevan: I see what you mean - the issue is not whether the text is in the ruleset but whether it is part of the Fame rule or the Bunker rule.  Oddly, I think it makes as much sense in its current location as it would in its intended location.  While I would not normally want to encourage creative adminning of rules, I think here it is OK because we do know what was intended and, if nothing else, the passage of Secure Beneath stands for the proposition that there is a quorum in favor of the entire text of The Fame Game being in the ruleset somewhere.