Didn’t even notice that was in there. In any case that is one ‘should’ that I will happily overlook.

[redtara] “Happily overlooking” fair play rules will still get a DoV voted down that relies on them.

Possibly, though it seems entirely possible to believe that someone *has in fact* achieved a victory that they *should not have* achieved. 

[redtara] I’m referring to the Fair Play line that players “should vote against any DoV that relies on having broken a fair play rule”.

Hey, I can veto this one! And I think I should, as it would allow scams based on rule precedence, which seems bad.