Note to Admins about Call for Judgment: Cleaning up the CfJ’s
Do not independently admin the CfJs mentioned there until the cleanup CfJ passes. As far as people on IRC can tell, that would cause the cleanup CfJ to fail.
Do not independently admin the CfJs mentioned there until the cleanup CfJ passes. As far as people on IRC can tell, that would cause the cleanup CfJ to fail.
posted by Sgeo at 22 Oct 2011 19:55:37 UTC Comments (2)
Yes, but note “After this time, if more than half the cast Votes are FOR Votes, the CfJ may be enacted by any Admin by updating or correcting the Gamestate and Ruleset as specified. Otherwise, the CfJ fails.”
So if all admins avoid enacting a CfJ, it won’t be enacted.
But failure happens automatically.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
0.9878
Kevan: he/him
The problem is that the cleanup CfJ says “If the following CfJ’s are still pending, fail them” - if some of the CfJs have already been processed (and “12/18/08” has already timed out), then the full is not “still pending”, and nothing happens.