Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Proposal: Now who would do that?

Reached quorum, 8-1.—Kevan

Adminned at 02 Aug 2006 22:52:54 UTC

Add the following text to Rule 2.8:

Shiny may not be awarded for the passage of a Local Proposal.

Comments

Thelonious:

08-01-2006 07:55:36 UTC

for

Saki:

08-01-2006 08:13:40 UTC

imperial
I don’t see a reason either way.

Kevan:

08-01-2006 08:40:59 UTC

against The Arbiter’s veto and Thelonius’s fix already deal with this.

Shiny doesn’t do anything anyway, except get taken away wearily by other players if you gain some through a scam.

Thelonious:

08-01-2006 08:44:10 UTC

for ‘no Shiny’ to counteract Kevan’s last comment.

Shadowclaw:

08-01-2006 10:31:40 UTC

imperial

Kevan:

08-01-2006 11:29:15 UTC

[Thelonius] Ha, thanks. What a horrible wording for a rule.

Bucky:

08-01-2006 15:46:35 UTC

for no Shiny just in case.

Hix:

08-01-2006 18:25:45 UTC

for sure

TAE:

08-02-2006 12:26:06 UTC

for
But no Shiny.  We should tink of something for Shiny to do.