Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Proposal: Nuh-Uh

Timed out. Fails 2-2—Clucky

Adminned at 30 Apr 2021 01:28:51 UTC

In the rule “Understanding”, replace “(if they have not already done so since the most recent Sweep)” with “(unless they have already done so since the most recent Sweep or they have a pending Challenge associated with them)”.
If an AI has become Non-Compliant and subsequently blanked their Understanding entirely within the time between this Proposal’s posting and its passing, Reinitialize them immediately.

no fake understanding chicanery under my watch!!

Comments

Kevan: HE/HIM

28-04-2021 11:26:09 UTC

imperial

That second clause may be unenactable: the “enacting admin must update a secretly tracked game variable that they can’t see, somehow” stuff recently was borderline, but “enacting admin must update a public variable according to secret variables they can’t see” seems plainly unperformable and would be skipped under “reaches a step which cannot be applied immediately”.

lemonfanta: SHE/HER

28-04-2021 13:02:02 UTC

i imagine it wld be theoretically upholdable if i was to state someone’s non-compliance in advance of the proposal’s anyway bc non-compliance is a subjective metric anyway :‘o

lemonfanta: SHE/HER

28-04-2021 13:03:03 UTC

*proposal’s passing, idk how that word got there

lemonfanta: SHE/HER

28-04-2021 13:06:05 UTC

oh wait i see, i accidentally select-deleted the entire middle section >:T

the comment was supposed 2 read “i imagine it wld be theoretically upholdable if i was to state someone’s non-compliance in advance of the proposal’s passing, but in retrospect challenges would have been better to reference anyway bc non-compliance is a subjective metric”

Jason: HE/HIM

28-04-2021 18:08:10 UTC

against per Kevan

Raven1207: HE/HIM

28-04-2021 22:29:24 UTC

against

lemonfanta: SHE/HER

29-04-2021 00:31:25 UTC

now hold on– kevan was saying the second clause won’t do anything, but the first clause is still important. if one half of this proposal does nothing and the other half fixes a scam, why r yall voting against it?