Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Call for Judgment: Occult Knowledge!?

2-5.  At least half the votes were against after four full days have passed.  CfJ fails.—Excalabur

Adminned at 12 May 2006 21:15:45 UTC

A rule entitled “Occult Knowledge” seems to have mysteriously appeared in the ruleset.  It did not arrive by proposal, was not added during AG’s dictatorship.  No rule uther than the dictatorship would have allowed AG to add this to the ruleset.

If at least half of all comments containing counted for votes also contain the text “Keep it”, the rules “Occult Knowledge” and “Location Effects” swap positions and numbers.

Otherwise, delete the rule “Occult Knowledge” from the ruleset and renumber the remainig rules accordingly.

posted by Call for Judgment at 09 May 2006 03:15:45 UTC Comments (15)

Comments

Angry Grasshopper:

09-05-2006 03:20:42 UTC

against

It was legally added to the ruleset.

Excalabur:

09-05-2006 10:21:48 UTC

*bwa bwa bwaaaa*

Rodney:

09-05-2006 13:39:38 UTC

for How so?

Hix:

09-05-2006 13:53:58 UTC

The wiki history shows that I am the one who added the rule—and at just about the same time as I posted notice of using an Encrypted Rule, too! against

Bucky:

09-05-2006 17:05:14 UTC

for
Just because the Encrypted Rule mentions a rule that doesn’t exist does NOT mean that said rule can be added to the Ruleset.

Angry Grasshopper:

09-05-2006 17:10:56 UTC

True, but what if the Encrypted Rule specifically permits the addition of rules under certain circumstances?

Bucky:

09-05-2006 17:16:42 UTC

That Encrypted rule did not yet exist!  The other one was not applicable.

Angry Grasshopper:

09-05-2006 17:28:56 UTC

>That Encrypted rule did not yet exist!  The other one was not applicable.

Which one are you refering to? When I read the Wiki logs (to check your argument for chronology) I see:

02:32, 12 Apr 2006 Angry grasshopper (The Codex)

and then

18:29, 12 Apr 2006 Hix (Rules)

the latter being the time when Hix added that rule to the ruleset.

Purplebeard:

09-05-2006 18:58:29 UTC

against Have faith in the Abbot.

Bucky:

09-05-2006 21:36:31 UTC

And I’m saying the existing one was not applicable.

Lex10:

10-05-2006 00:08:56 UTC

against

Thelonious:

10-05-2006 08:37:22 UTC

imperial

Having no knowledge of the secret things of this world, I place my trust in the abbot.

Excalabur:

10-05-2006 12:21:31 UTC

Can’t vote IMP on a DoV.

(Unless the rules got changed when I wasn’t looking)

Purplebeard:

10-05-2006 14:25:12 UTC

You mean a CfJ. :)

Thelonious:

10-05-2006 14:33:39 UTC

Well, since the abbot has already spoken, I’ll match it myself.  against