Sunday, January 18, 2009

Ok, I admit it…

I turned off the CfJ on the multi-user drop down purely because it was being used in a way that was completely against its original intention.  As you can see, it is back on now, so please do not go back to spamming or I might be tempted to give it another time out.  Please don’t be the one that ruins it for everyone else.

Please note that at any time any Admin could have just as easily turned it back on…



01-18-2009 05:09:34 UTC

You know, with some time checking, I identified who this is.


01-18-2009 05:10:40 UTC

Compare the member local time of CfJ to the member local times of other members.

I shall now, for the protection of <name omitted>, make a post as CfJ.


01-18-2009 06:41:51 UTC

against  against  against  against  against

Options should not be illegally removed. I veto  upon this action.

against  against  against  against  against


01-18-2009 06:44:49 UTC

The CFJ needed to be timed out (3 CFJ DoV’s in a row followed by a complaint from the CFJ), but not illegally. A proposal probably would have passed.


01-18-2009 06:50:10 UTC

It’s not ok to do things because you think they would have been approved. There’s a reason people vote on proposals; because sometimes the proposals won’t pass. Otherwise, Members would just enact proposals without conference. It’s not ok.  against


01-18-2009 07:52:56 UTC

What Qwaz said.


01-18-2009 16:14:24 UTC

I don’t suppose someone would like to come forward and explain to the admins how it was done?