What “If fame is unbounded” means? 

Perhaps “has no maximum value” would have been clearer than “unbounded”, but I believe that they both mean (almost) the same thing.

Actually, that phrase was meant to take care of your comment on The Doctor’s version.

Shouldn’t Oscars have some relation to Critical Acclaim?

Possibly.  Critics are often wrong about how movies will fare in the Oscars, however: they don’t actually have a say in the result.

unbounded is a well-defined term, and is in fact more precise and more correct than ‘has no maximum value’ in this context.  The set of real numbers less than three, for instance, has no maximum value, but is bounded.

I am firmly against determining Oscars in this manner. I either want to see an Academy doing awards (preferrably in addition to our current Critics), Rolls to determine who among those adding named roles in a set period (occuring regularly), or some completely different manner of determining who wins awards.

Cov, Agree with Viewtyjoe

, and to those of you who’ve been suggesting such things, I don’t think Critical Acclaim should be made into a major gameplay factor (at least, not yet).  Remember that the method of gaining CA is tied to proposal-authoring, and thus is not linked strongly flavorwise to this dynasty’s theme.

I fail to see how the unbounded thing addresses the infinity issue. And I know what “unbounded” means. Could you care to explain how would Fame become unbounded?

If someone changed the rules so that fame was unbounded? Its very unlikely, more like a just-in-case kinda thing.

The infinity problem is solved by the phrasing: “When any Actor adds a named role to eir Filmography” placing a limit on when it is do-able.  an since an Actor “may make a DICEX roll” we’ve established a limit of times per condition met.  When an Actor adds a named role he is permited to make a DICEX roll.  The phrases says you can make 1 dice roll every time you add a named roll.

I like it. 

And how the unbounded thing relates to that?

Ok.  I misunderstood which issue was the “infinity” issue (your comment wasn’t exactly specific).  I thought you were referring to the presence of one of the proposals that would make Fame unbounded, thus having a maximum value of “infinity”.

For the other issue, Amnistar’s analysis is correct.  I changed the trigger to be an event rather than a continuous state of affairs.