Proposal: Out in the light
Reaches quorum with 7-0 and is enacted -SingularByte
Adminned at 09 Jul 2023 21:47:31 UTC
In rule 2.1, replace ” If there are fewer than five Machinists who have either voted on a proposal or taken a dynastic action in the preceding 4 days”
with
If there are fewer than five Machinists who have either voted on a proposal or publicly taken a dynastic action in the preceding 4 days
I’m sad I missed the last dynasty because by the time I noticed how interesting it was looking, it would’ve been too late to jump in. However, this one also looks good so I figure I’ll jump in with an obvious rules fix: some dynastic actions can potentially only be known to the Machinist and the Grand Machine, so we can and should exclude them from consideration for Omertas. Net character change of 9.
Kevan: he/him
Tangentially, should we even count “voted on a proposal” here?
The issue last dynasty was that the game went down to a 2-vs-1 endgame but didn’t trip into Dormancy because although Raven1207 wasn’t playing the dynastic game, they were still regularly casting votes.