Thursday, June 01, 2023

Proposal: Out of Mind

enacted 7-0, chiiika.

Adminned at 02 Jun 2023 06:48:53 UTC

To the end of “Mindjacking”, add a paragraph:-

If a Mindjacking cannot be marked with a FOR symbol according to the previous paragraph, then the Ascendant should, at their earliest opportunity, mark it with an AGAINST symbol.

Once a Mindjacking has been marked with a FOR or AGAINST symbol from the Ascendant according to this rule, it ceases to be considered a Mindjacking.

I suppose Josh can’t comment on incorrect Mindjackings (or arguably even draw our attention to the fact that he can’t do this) per “information [...] described as being tracked secretly or privately [...] may only be revealed by the Ascendant when the ruleset allows it”.

Comments

lemon: she/her

01-06-2023 19:55:39 UTC

definite greentick from me!

Bucky:

01-06-2023 22:06:02 UTC

“ceases to be considered a Mindjacking” is a bad wording; among other problems, Mindjacking is a daily action but if the thing I did two hours ago isn’t considered a Mindjacking anymore I can do it again.

Josh: he/they

01-06-2023 22:27:48 UTC

Good point, out of the edit window.

for further fix proposals encouraged

lemon: she/her

01-06-2023 22:35:57 UTC

for

Bucky:

01-06-2023 22:55:47 UTC

imperial

Chiiika: she/her

01-06-2023 22:59:41 UTC

for

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

01-06-2023 23:13:00 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

01-06-2023 23:57:25 UTC

for