Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Proposal: [Para]site

Unstable proposal. Josh.  Re-failed by Dk after it’s reopening

Adminned at 20 Feb 2020 15:44:19 UTC

Add to both the Alpha and Prime Ruleset the following

The Scientist named Cuddlebeam has achieved victory

Comments

Madrid:

19-02-2020 20:26:27 UTC

for

pokes:

19-02-2020 20:33:52 UTC

against

The Duke of Waltham: he/him

19-02-2020 20:45:05 UTC

against This is an Unstable proposal, by the way: it has the wrong tags.

So… Yes. This part of the Ruleset seems to function.

Madrid:

19-02-2020 20:53:33 UTC

Correct

The Duke of Waltham: he/him

19-02-2020 21:00:06 UTC

Which means that any Admin who is satisfied that this proposal is indeed Unstable (once it has been pointed out in a comment, even by themselves) can Fail it immediately.

Josh: Observer he/they

19-02-2020 21:07:24 UTC

I’m not sure that I’m a fan of the out of order failing but okay

Kevan: he/him

19-02-2020 21:08:53 UTC

You could also veto it to be on the safe side.

against as I’m not familiar enough with the ruleset to judge its stability.

Josh: Observer he/they

19-02-2020 21:23:21 UTC

against This proposal was closed for voting from 21:07 UTC to 21:19 UTC.

Lulu: she/her

19-02-2020 21:41:23 UTC

imperial

Darknight: he/him

19-02-2020 21:48:58 UTC

against

The Duke of Waltham: he/him

19-02-2020 21:53:46 UTC

[Josh] You can propose changing the rule, so that Unstable proposals have to be Failed in order of submission, just like self-killed ones.

Farsight:

20-02-2020 08:13:20 UTC

against Cuddlebeam, i like your style ;)