Proposal: Personal Criteria
Timed out, 3-2. Enacted by JonathanDark.
Adminned at 18 Apr 2024 21:16:13 UTC
Add a subrule to Criteria named ‘Personal Criteria’ as such:
Personal Criteria
A Seeker may choose to have a Personal Criteria by making a blog post stating that they wish to do so. All other active Seekers then vote upon Personal Criteria by either stating an object, or by voting :for: with the name of the object or the player who proposed the object’s username. The object with the most :for: votes wins. The Seeker whose Personal Criteria is being voted upon may object to the other Seekers’ choice of Personal Criteria if the Seeker can reasonably prove that there is no such object in their vicinity, that the object is too large or too small, or that the object does not exist. This object becomes the Seeker’s Personal Criteria, which is publicly tracked.
In the rule Scoring, add
If a Seeker who has a Personal Criteria does not include it in their Snap, the Snap is worth 0 points. If they do include their Personal Criteria, then they get three extra points on top of the points they would get normally.
new player, new rules
JonathanDark: he/him
First, the use of “points” is not quite the correct terminology, although that can be fixed. Use “score” instead.
Second, how do we enforce the idea that a Snap is worth 0 Score? There are two ways to earn score:
1) Respond to a Snap stating the Private Criteria satisfied and not satisfied. The Seeker who posted the Snap can earn Score here, so the “Snap is worth 0 Score” could apply here. Should it?
2) If a responding Seeker says that the Snap is aesthetically pleasing. The Seeker who posted the Snap can earn Score here, so the “Snap is worth 0 Score” could apply here. Should it?