Sunday, March 21, 2021

Call for Judgment: Play Dice, Not CfJs

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 0 votes to 5 by Kevan.

Adminned at 21 Mar 2021 15:16:13 UTC

Uphold all rolls made in the Fourteenth Dynasty of Josh.

Those dice rolls also used the undefined CSV rolls, and DoVs resetting things don’t really work because DoVs were disabled.

Comments

Clucky: he/him

21-03-2021 00:39:51 UTC

against

past dynasties should stay in the past

arguing that you can uphold rolls in past dynasties also means that you can vote to *reverse* rolls in past dynasties. and that is a can of worms we don’t want to get into

Raven1207: he/they

21-03-2021 03:47:24 UTC

against

Bucky:

21-03-2021 03:59:13 UTC

against
Including the ones that were overturned as illegal?

Lulu: she/her

21-03-2021 04:20:22 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

21-03-2021 08:15:48 UTC

This does get a bit hazy for unnecessarily upholding non-comma-list rolls, possibly including Brendan’s Merchant Circle stuff.

[Clucky] Past dynasties definitely should stay in the past, but per comments on Play Cards Not Dice, the previous dynasty was unique for switching off the regular “anyone can declare, players vote freely” DoV system.

Josh: he/they

21-03-2021 09:00:15 UTC

Sure does feel like something unambiguous in Victory and Ascension would be helpful, huh.

Kevan: he/him

21-03-2021 09:37:11 UTC

Definitely. I’d vote for that, I just didn’t think that “the gamestate is upheld in full” satisfied the thorny requirements of the situation (and I wasn’t convinced by the unrelated rework of Player/Emperor terms that it was bundled with).

Josh: he/they

21-03-2021 10:19:40 UTC

Sometimes it’s better to pass and fix than endlessly letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. See: imperatives rework. (Accept your point re the bundling of the terminology issue, although I still disagree on the merits)

pokes:

21-03-2021 12:44:30 UTC

against