Sunday, December 17, 2023

Proposal: Political Transparency

Timed out 2 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan, and I’m assuming that this doesn’t remove the Strengths from the ruletext as it didn’t say to do so.

Adminned at 19 Dec 2023 17:07:05 UTC

In the rule “Claims”, replace “a nonnegative integer value for Strength” with “a publicly tracked nonnegative integer value for Strength”.


JonathanDark: he/him

17-12-2023 18:13:22 UTC

What problem is this solving? The Claim Strength is already visible in the ruleset. There’s also several other attributes of Claims like type, conditions, disown list, that you don’t seem to be concerned about.


17-12-2023 18:28:57 UTC

It’s just frustrating to have to switch between the ruleset and the gamestate tracking page every time I want to see for example who has the single strongest claim

JonathanDark: he/him

17-12-2023 19:30:08 UTC

It feels like what you really want is to publicly track each Heir’s strongest Claim. It’s a derived value, so it doesn’t need to be tracked in the strict sense, but for convenience, if that’s what you want so that you don’t have to take notes, I would re-word your Proposal to do exactly that instead.

Kevan: he/him

17-12-2023 19:37:16 UTC

Just tracking each Claim’s Strength on the wiki page makes a lot of sense to me - we don’t only care about the Strongest Claims, but also the ones which may or may not be far behind.

Kevan: he/him

19-12-2023 09:57:19 UTC