I have a plan to end this dynasty very soon but would like to get the popular opinion on this matter before I actually make the proposal.
Please comment to this post on whether or not you want to see this dynasty to end quickly and fairly.
I have a plan to end this dynasty very soon but would like to get the popular opinion on this matter before I actually make the proposal.
Please comment to this post on whether or not you want to see this dynasty to end quickly and fairly.
One quick and dirty way of ending the dynasty is to have proposals as follows:
(1) create a randomized list of non-wounded, non-yellow players;
(2) Big train robbery attempt, with one Guard (with a high Quickdraw) and so many Safes in play that a successful robber would probably win.
(3) People line up in the order of #1 to attempt to rob the train.
(4) Repeat as necessary
I would want players’ money to have some effect on the end result—maybe people should be able to buy something with their money that could improve their chances in the OK Corral?
After each round of the tournament, each victor would rob their opponent. That way the money victory condition would probably be achieved first.
Frankly, just leave it as it is. I think we have enough for the Dynasty to end on its own.
Night:
I’ve kinda liked the theme of this dynasty, but there’s little denying it’s taking a very long time to play out. And, since 70-80% of the players fold from each hand, if victory rested on playing cards to win, could take quite a long time indeed.
I’m personally okay with it ending, but I’m also good with letting it continue. Guess I’d prolly lean more towards
.