Monday, January 27, 2025

Praying scored

We scored – “praying” is in the ruleset (“having” → “paving” → “paying” → “praying”). Triumphs changed like this.

Comments

Josh: he/they

27-01-2025 21:49:56 UTC

Congrats, I guess. Big strong team of five bullying the team of two off of its spot. Enjoy the big win fellas! And also the one after it I guess. Nothing but freebies today!

JonathanDark: he/him

27-01-2025 22:08:18 UTC

To be fair, it was only a team of 2 at the time that made it happen. I made one change, and ais made two with Focus. No 5 vs 2 bullying required.

ais523:

27-01-2025 22:32:58 UTC

It would/could have been 3 versus 4 – you could have appointed a Spy. That’s part of the reason we did it with just me and JonathanDark – involving fewer players reduced the chance that a Spy could mess things up.

Josh: he/they

27-01-2025 22:40:46 UTC

Once you two had electorally invalidated our earned triumph it didn’t quite seem worth it.

ais523:

27-01-2025 22:59:08 UTC

I’m assuming the admin-advantage scam in “Reading Rainbow” wasn’t intentional? (Both teams were three actions, which they had guaranteed, away from scoring as soon as the proposal was enacted – we were kind-of pressured into exploiting it ourselves to prevent you doing it.)

JonathanDark: he/him

27-01-2025 23:03:08 UTC

I thought Josh was referring to the whole CfJ debacle, which wasn’t the whole story anyway. There was already the issue of “The Crew” containing “omptionally” that should have prevented a Tools of the Trade interaction in any part of that rule.

Habanero:

28-01-2025 03:19:53 UTC

An amazing performance from team Praying. As you all ascend to lexical godhood I can only hope you remember us poor common folk. Congratulations!

You must be registered and logged in to post comments.