Wednesday, June 26, 2019

Call for Judgment: Precision In Victory

Reached quorum 7 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Jun 2019 17:52:31 UTC

Add to the rule to the ruleset named “Victory”:

No wizard may achieve victory by using a rule that does not use the phrase “has achieved victory”. A wizard who is a “Victor” has not achieved victory. 

Immediately after a proposal containing the word “Victor” is enacted, change all instances of “Victor” to “Triumphant”. If the word ‘Triumphant’ appears in the ruleset, any admin may delete this rule

This is a call for judgement because it is time sensitive. Concern has been expressed that “Won the Cattle but not the Boar” contains a scam in it, and this is to resolve such a scam.


Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2019 12:20:15 UTC



26-06-2019 13:59:17 UTC

for This seems to solve it.


26-06-2019 14:11:28 UTC



26-06-2019 14:54:56 UTC

for sorry all, i should have spotted this.


26-06-2019 16:54:19 UTC

No worries, it happens!


26-06-2019 17:10:33 UTC

Lol. Can we not change all instances of victory to triumphanty? Seems unlikely to break existing victory rules, but hilarity aside, not ideal.

Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2019 17:25:33 UTC

Ha. But fortunately this CfJ cannot affect the Core or Appendix rules, because it doesn’t have the appropriate tags.


26-06-2019 17:43:57 UTC

Oh nifty! So if someone got “repeal all rules” passed without any tags, it would just repeal all dynasty rules?



26-06-2019 17:47:04 UTC


Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2019 17:51:25 UTC

Yeah, the tags are largely there to stop that kind of accidental wreckage.