Monday, June 25, 2018

Proposal: Prophesy

Became unpopular 1 to 6. Failed by Derrick.

Adminned at 26 Jun 2018 17:38:38 UTC

Add the following card named “prophesy” under “Spells”:

Score: 0
Constraint: Can only be played if you have at least one other spell in hand not named “prophesy”.
Up effect: Randomly choose three cards in the deck and select one to add to your hand. The other cards go back in the deck.
Down effect: Nothing happens.

The score is zero because the effect is powerful.


Kevan: City he/him

25-06-2018 17:46:39 UTC

I’m not sure how this is meant to work - the game as currently written has no defined “deck” to look at or shuffle.


25-06-2018 18:02:14 UTC

well… we can add the deck later right?

derrick: he/him

25-06-2018 18:23:22 UTC

I would not count on a deck.

You could say “Randomly select three cards from the deck and add one of your choice to your hand”. That would have almost the same effect.

Lulu: she/her

26-06-2018 00:00:06 UTC

against see above


26-06-2018 02:40:27 UTC

imperial for now

Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2018 07:47:49 UTC


Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2018 09:09:02 UTC

Actually against , there’s already another card called “The Prophecy” and I’ve got a bad feeling about the unnecessary “The other cards go back in the deck.”

derrick: he/him

26-06-2018 12:53:05 UTC

for The names are different, and I don’t think “The other cards go back in the deck” is enforceable. Unless we make a deck.

Kevan: City he/him

26-06-2018 13:10:12 UTC

There is a proposal in the queue to define the deck as all the cards not in Wizards’ hands. Under which “the other cards go back in the deck” can be read (with only a small amount of perversity) as removing all cards from all players’ hands.


26-06-2018 16:42:36 UTC

against as per Kevan

Brendan: he/him

26-06-2018 17:28:53 UTC


derrick: he/him

26-06-2018 17:38:07 UTC


Lets move the Queue along