Wednesday, April 08, 2020

Proposal: Working with Tools

Self Killed—Failed by Clucky

Adminned at 10 Apr 2020 21:16:27 UTC

Add a New Dynastic Rule named “Materials”

Each Villager has a numeric amount of Stone that defaults to 1. Each Villager has a numeric amount of Wood which defaults to 3.

If the Proposal “Trying Again” passes, add the “Woodchopping” and “Crafting” tasks:

* Woodchopping: The Villager gains 100 Bells and 1 Wood. If a Jock Villager performs this action, they instead gain 120 Bells and 1 Wood.

* Crafting: If the Villager has at least 5 Wood, they gain a Wooden Axe or Wooden Pickaxe, as decided by the Player who tasked them. If the Villager has at least 3 wood and at least 3 Stone, they gain a Stone Axe or Stone Pickaxe, as decided by the player who tasked them.

If the Proposal “Trying Again” passes, add a Dynastic Subrule called “Tools” to the Dynastic Rule “Tasks”:

There are four tools a Villager can own.

* Wooden Axe: When the Villager performs the Woodchopping task, the Player who sent them on that task rolls a DICE2 in the Dice Roller. If the roll is a 2, the Villager gains 1 additional Wood from the task.

* Wooden Pickaxe: When the Villager performs the Mining task, the Player who sent them on that task rolls a DICE2 in the Dice Roller. If the roll is a 2, the Villager gains 1 additional Stone from the task.

* Stone Axe: When the Villager performs the Woodchopping task, the Villager gains 1 additional Wood from the task.

* Stone Pickaxe: When the Villager performs the Mining task, the Villager gains 1 additional Stone from the task.

Comments

JimothyFromTLTT:

09-04-2020 00:44:14 UTC

I misclicked, drats. Self killing against

Darknight: he/him

09-04-2020 00:50:07 UTC

What went wrong?

JimothyFromTLTT:

09-04-2020 00:50:12 UTC

Un-self killed, I guess. I’ve ironed out all of the errors from what I can see.  for

Darknight: he/him

09-04-2020 00:51:52 UTC

When a Nobleman casts a vote AGAINST their own Proposal (which is not in the form of a DEFERENTIAL vote), this renders the Proposal Self-Killed, even if the author later changes their Vote.

Sadly this stays self killed

JimothyFromTLTT:

09-04-2020 00:55:14 UTC

It still probably needs a few more things before it’s perfect, so it’s nbd

Clucky: he/him

09-04-2020 01:10:22 UTC

Promising start, though I’m curious what others thing about introducing the concept of items again but I think we can keep it different enough.

Should probably make it so that you can earn stone from mining. Also probably want rules about having only one item equipped at a time.

Kevan: he/him

09-04-2020 09:12:21 UTC

Self-kills have to be irreversible to be meaningful - they’re a deliberate shortcut so that we know a proposal is sunk, and can safely stop discussing it and voting on it.

(Strictly speaking it’s also against the rules to edit a proposal after someone has voted on it, even that vote was from yourself.)