In this example, do you have to define what a week is, or can you use the glossary definition? Also, do you want to allow for multiple victors? Finally, are you sure you want to provide an example that encourages proposal spam?

I deliberately chose “proposals enacted”, not “proposals proposed”, in order to avoid proposal spam being useful at stopping the challenge. Also, multiple victors is impossible (you can’t duplicate someone else’s guess), and the glossary definition should be fine.

Any more comments before I make this an actual competition? I’ll probably wait until Thursday, to avoid time-zone scams.

Only a raised eyebrow at the idea of encouraging tactical self-kills so near to the start of a dynasty.

@Kevan: good point, I didn’t think of that at all. I’ll see if I can think up a less abusable way to word the condition.

those encryptions in the flavor bar are giving me a headache as an FYI

<quote>After a week has ended, if the number of proposals enacted that week equals a Befuddled’s guess (the Victor), then once for each other Befuddled who made a Guess for that week, the Victor can transfer 1 IQ from that Befuddled to himself.</quote>

That ought to be “each other Befuddled who made a false guess that week” or something similar, since now you can transfer from other winners.

Darth: as ais523 mentioned, each guess must be unique.