Add a new rule, “Victory Conditions”:
A player can achieve victory if they meet at least 2/3 of all Victory Conditions simultaneously, and there are at least 3 such conditions.
Victory Conditions: **Here go victory conditions eg. reach milestone X, make at least 5 changes to core rules, have never lost any points, etc. idk, this is a protosal**
Also, to avoid confusion you should probably call them Achievements or similar.
We could just start with 1 victory condition . . . that would be good.
This is to make this the *only* way to win, instead of having several win conditions.
This is probably a scam. After all, quite a few players here (all of them?) have never lost any points; and probably someone has made at least 5 changes to the core ruleset. Your examples are unfortunately binding, the way the proposal reads…
Also, this isn’t actually a proposal. (Is it meant to be a proto? (Agoran language: “proto” = something that looks similar to a game action, but is deliberately done in an ineffective manner so that people can discuss it before it’s actually done.) I’m wondering if the apparent typo in the title is deliberate.
ais: it is a Protosal. Notice it’s not in the proposal category.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Bucky: