Call for Judgment: Quorum issue.
Reaches Quorum at 1-0 and is Enacted. - lilomar
Adminned at 15 Jul 2010 12:03:58 UTC
Issue, simply by referring to a quorum of @s with a specific attribute, anyone may reduce quorum to an arbitrary number, down to one.
If a Quorum of @s with over 100 deaths posts the phrase “not likely” to this CFJ, nothing special happens. Note that Quorum is now 0/2+1, or 1.
Reasoning:
1) The Definition of Quorum in rule 3.1 states
If a Rule or other Gamestate document refers to a Quorum of some subset of @s (such as a Quorum of @s who share a particular Gamestate attribute, but excluding all other @s) then Quorum is equal to half the number of @s who share that Gamestate attribute, rounded down, plus one.
2) This CfJ is a Gamestate document, and refers to a Quorum of a subset of @s. (specifically, @‘s with over 20 deaths)
3) Quorum is equal to half the number of @s who share that Gamestate attribute (0), rounded down (still 0), plus one (1).
Therefore do the following:
Create a dynastic rule, entitled “Game, Set, Match” with the text
lilomar has achieved victory.
The amend the definition of Quorum in rule 3.1 from
If a Rule or other Gamestate document refers to a Quorum of some subset of @s (such as a Quorum of @s who share a particular Gamestate attribute, but excluding all other @s) then Quorum is equal to half the number of @s who share that Gamestate attribute, rounded down, plus one.
to
If a Rule or other Gamestate document refers to a Quorum of some subset of @s (such as a Quorum of @s who share a particular Gamestate attribute, but excluding all other @s) then, for the purposes of that reference, Quorum is equal to half the number of @s who share that Gamestate attribute, rounded down, plus one.
Purplebeard:
Illegally adminned: the author of a CfJ does not automatically vote FOR.