Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Proposal: Quorum Transparency

Self-killed. Josh

Adminned at 24 Nov 2011 00:48:17 UTC

Add to the end of Rule “Idle Players”:

Whenever an Admin makes a blog post or comment announcing the Idling or Unidling of one or more Players, that Admin must also concomitantly announce any resulting Quorum changes.

 

Comments

Cpt_Koen:

22-11-2011 01:19:59 UTC

against I’m for the idea, but in my opinion, said Admin should announce the new Quorum, even if it hasn’t change.

Spitemaster:

22-11-2011 01:37:03 UTC

imperial

Bucky:

22-11-2011 04:17:26 UTC

against
Replace “must” with “should” and I approve

Josh: Observer he/they

22-11-2011 07:26:08 UTC

against If they don’t, does that mean that the idlings themselves are illegal?

Kevan: he/him

22-11-2011 08:30:36 UTC

against Per Josh and Bucky - getting quorum wrong shouldn’t invalidate the idling.

ChronosPhaenon:

22-11-2011 12:58:15 UTC

against Ok, I’ll repropose as soon as I get the slot back.