Thursday, February 12, 2009

That’s not fair…

Just so you know, I don’t think that it is fair for me to mess with Qwaz’s account. I would Seriously NOT mess with his admin powers were he an admin. In fact, If I did, I would allow you to ban me. Don’t be mad at Qwaz for what I do. In fact, even if I was an admin, I wouldn’t screw with the site just to see what happened. I’m just not that dumb. So if you were going to make Qwaz an admin, do. If not then don’t. Just don’t base your choice on me.

Comments

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 00:27:49 UTC

In all honesty?  you’re probably right, there is an element of unfairness to this.  But it’s not like we’re keeping you from playing the game.  Heck, the advantages of being an admin are fairly minute in all honesty.  Those individuals that win rarely win because they use their admin powers to help them. 

But even considering that?  It’s not our fault that you have shown yourself to be the type of person that isn’t trusted; nor is it our fault that you seem unable to keep your accounts seperate, even after you said that you would.

Qwazukee:

13-02-2009 00:44:49 UTC

You use an awful lot of singular here, Amni, when appearing to reference me and Wak; I’m not sure whether I should protest.

I think that there are major advantages to adminship; or rather, there are major disadvantages to non-adminship. It is my hope that I will develop a reputation good enough to earn adminship in a Dynasty or two, and at some point, I think the “Wak might take you over!” argument will die out; I have as much interest in not letting him use my account as you do.

However, I’m still relatively new, so I understand now.

And I’m getting pretty good at keeping my acoount and his separate. . . .

Qwazukee:

13-02-2009 00:45:22 UTC

Just out of curiosity, when was the last time a non-Admin won a dynasty?

Kevan: he/him

13-02-2009 00:51:35 UTC

Records seem to say Spikebrennan, last year. I think we’ve generally tended to automatically promote winners to admin status so that they could better manage their own dynasty, though.

I can’t remember any “I enact this proposal, and bang, bang, bang, I win instantly” victories. If there’s a tendency for admins to win, it’s because they’re the people who tend to take a closer interest in the game, and stick around for longer.

Amnistar: he/him

13-02-2009 00:59:19 UTC

Also remember that there was a point at which EVERYONE playing was admined.

Qwaz, my singularity is directed towards Wak, not you.

TrumanCapote:

13-02-2009 01:25:57 UTC

@ Kevan

That’s how I won.  But I self-failed a batch of proposals.

Darknight: he/him

13-02-2009 03:37:15 UTC

Rod won a dynasty based on how well he did admin duties. was rather funny. And Qwaz, I’m not saying you’d be a bad admin but i’m also not saying that you’ll never slip and leave ya account the active one. trust me we all forget something. Ya run that risk most if ya have to rush out. i gave ya a imperial vote based on you kinda running in the middle. Your pretty honest but noones ever perfect in always remembering.

Darknight: he/him

13-02-2009 03:37:39 UTC

the rod is rodlen btw

Wakukee:

13-02-2009 04:58:45 UTC

Qwaz didn’t post this. I did, and if I can read, then it promises that I wouln’t abuse his powers. It doesn’t matter how much he screws up and leaves his account logged in, I won’t mess with it. I’m not dumb.

Wooden Squid:

14-02-2009 21:06:20 UTC

Well, Wak, looks as if you have a reputation to repair then.