Monday, December 11, 2023

Proposal: Recovered Blueprints

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 0 votes to 4 by Kevan.

Adminned at 13 Dec 2023 08:48:24 UTC

Add the following rows to the table of Tracts in the rule Estates:

Caretaker’s Hut | This estate gains 1 Prestige.
Markets | The Palatine of this estate may pay two of a given resource to earn one of a different resource.
Poorhouse | The Palatine of this estate gains 6 Reputation, and this estate loses 3 Prestige.
Gardens | The Palatine of this estate may reduce their stress by up to 4.
Private Kitchens | The Palatine of this estate increases the health of the Old King by 4, or decreases the health of the Old King by 4.

This is a reproposal of my previous attempt at this now that you can only use tracts once a week. It has an extra tract to give some small push to extend or reduce the length of the game - at most by a few days per week, if you throw everything you have at it.

posted by SingularByte at 11 Dec 2023 12:05:00 UTC Comments (10)

Comments

SingularByte: he/him

11-12-2023 17:43:43 UTC

Actually, I think I might idle out of this one. I’ve been angling for a scam win but it’s not really coming together and I don’t have the level of focus to try and defend my claims conventionally.

Player count is 7, quorum is 4.

Desertfrog: Jury

11-12-2023 18:27:22 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

11-12-2023 19:12:38 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

11-12-2023 19:12:50 UTC

whoops for

JonathanDark: he/him

11-12-2023 19:16:02 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

11-12-2023 20:35:43 UTC

SingularByte bowed out too soon, their scam is still active here due to an oversight in the News proposals that left “As a weekly atomic action for a given estate…” in place. (What The Curtains is fixing it, but is later in the queue.) The enacting admin would still be able to cycle Poorhouse Estates to gain infinite Reputation and Resources.

Except now with bonus “kill the king” Private Kitchens to end the game as well.

Enacting admin wins after performing a long chain of actions.

against

JonathanDark: he/him

11-12-2023 20:58:46 UTC

CoV against

And pat on the back to Kevan for not staying silent and exploiting the scam?

(or he was worried another enacting admin would get to it first)

Clucky: he/him

11-12-2023 21:14:12 UTC

timer wasn’t in Kevan’s favor here, as this wouldn’t enactable for a few more hours even if it got a 4th vote so one of us probably would’ve gotten to it first

Clucky: he/him

11-12-2023 22:18:42 UTC

against still might change my vote later if it looks like I can work with someone to get this passed, but for now definitely safter to keep this in an against state

Desertfrog: Jury

12-12-2023 06:33:53 UTC

CoV against