Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Proposal: Recruitment Drive

Times out at 6-5. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 23 Jul 2010 01:54:23 UTC

Cause all @s with 0 Deaths and a role of “-” to die, as if a rule caused them to die. @s who unidled or became @s after this proposal was posted are unaffected.

Not picking a role is currently a tactically valid option for active @s, as it gives other @s (mainly myself) less incentive to attack them because they have no items to loot. This forces them to pick a role and play, and also weeds out inactive players.

posted by Purplebeard at 21 Jul 2010 08:46:22 UTC Comments (18)

Comments

Purplebeard:

21-07-2010 09:02:32 UTC

For reference, this proposal specifically targets Ienpw III, comex and Brownie.

ais523:

21-07-2010 09:09:40 UTC

for

Josh: he/they

21-07-2010 09:47:56 UTC

for

lilomar:

21-07-2010 12:50:36 UTC

for

Klisz:

21-07-2010 16:28:12 UTC

for

Bucky:

21-07-2010 18:25:06 UTC

imperial

redtara: they/them

21-07-2010 19:08:19 UTC

against

Bucky:

21-07-2010 19:47:47 UTC

CoV against

Galdyn:

21-07-2010 20:05:01 UTC

for

Klisz:

21-07-2010 21:01:53 UTC

CoV against

dbdougla:

22-07-2010 01:15:21 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

22-07-2010 01:59:47 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

22-07-2010 02:12:13 UTC

I’m not sure how killing someone motivates them to pick a role.

Purplebeard:

22-07-2010 09:03:01 UTC

I’m not sure I understand; they only die if they don’t pick a role before this is passed. Ienpw III is safe now.

Klisz:

22-07-2010 16:56:05 UTC

Death is only a bad thing if you’ve already picked a role.

Purplebeard:

22-07-2010 20:31:10 UTC

Or if you’re going for an elimination win, which seems like the best path to victory right now.

ais523:

22-07-2010 20:33:07 UTC

Elimination and amulet wins are actually pretty similar strategywise, right now; either will involve killing the high-levelled players. The difference mostly depends on what happens on dlvl 1.

Qwazukee:

22-07-2010 23:33:57 UTC

against