Call for Judgment: Quicker Bureaucracy
Times out 1-5. Failed by pokes.
Adminned at 16 Jul 2017 12:24:06 UTC
I believe that there will be cases where the same Promises might be broken repeatedly (for example, I possibly might trigger a Backlash with every Proposal and that might bog down things). So this Call for Proposal aims to remove redundant Backlashes (and add some extra useful info too).
Add to “Pact Magic”:
The Date of the latest Extreme Seizure a Pactmaker has been was given is tracked on “Seizure Date” in the GNDT.
A Pactmaker can voluntarily publicly state that they Crack a Promise along an action - this breaks that Promise (regardless of if that action breaks that Promise’s text content or not). Then, such an action then cannot be a target of a Magic Backlash due to that Promise, and the the appropriate GNDT/Wiki/other game values are changed as per the consequences a Magic Backlash, if it was applied at the time of performing that action and towards the action with the Promise Cracking.
Avoiding repeated Magic Backlash bureaucracy for the same thing, but keeping the same effects as if such a Backlash had happened (Scorn rewards, etc, are kept).
Kevan: he/him
Agreed on the bureaucracy, but it seems wrong to make this an objective “game values are changed”, when Backlashes are normally a subjective vote. The “same kind of infraction” seems broad enough that it could cover angles which would have failed a vote.