To the people of my region: Apparently, despite all efforts to work on advancing our region, all 3 of our citizens instead did nothing. Therefore, we will make a mega-hotel to entice more workers such that we can make them do all the work.
I make a Motion to Build a Residential Zone in Scamsville.
I make a Motion to Build a Residential Zone in Scamsville.
I make a Motion to Build a Residential Zone in Scamsville.
This forum is now closed, with all motions successful (unless I’ve gotten the rules wrong for a third time in a row.)
Umm…
“A post with the Event type’s name as a tag is an Event of that type”.
...I don’t see any tag.
I think I might just idle out. That’s three times in a row now I’ve gotten the development forums wrong, so I’m probably not in the right head space for it.
Hmm, someone had made a comment in a previous dynasty that the tag requirement on an Event is actually not necessary due to another rule. I haven’t found the comment or the rule in question yet, but I’ll keep looking.
Ah, now I realize why I couldn’t find it. It was actually a discussion in Discord:
https://discord.com/channels/872395362336395324/872594105090310264/1097652131542077511
Excerpt here:
Interesting. I’m not convinced that it needs a tag - “A post with the Event type’s name as a tag is an Event of that type” doesn’t say anything about a post without that tag, provided that it meets the criteria of having “a type name, such as “Auction” or “Quest””, which my post does
Given that non-votable matters can’t have tags I’d call that a contradiction, although the appendix does have precedence
I think I’m going to leave it up as a test case, as will note that that contradiction probably needs resolving
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
SingularByte: he/him
I pledge 1 population to the first motion.
I pledge 1 population to the second motion.
I pledge 1 population to the third motion.