Adminned at 14 Dec 2009 07:11:27 UTC
Add the following to rule 2.4, Djinni in a lamp, baby:
If an Adventurer causes the Djinni to be released from the lamp, that Adventurer gains 3 more wishes, unless that Adventurer caused the Djinni to enter the lamp.
Self-killed, final vote 7 
- 5 
Uh… there’s a problem with the ruleset.
“Djinni” is singular.
“Djinn” is plural.
Is there any way TO realease the Djinn? Personally, I wanted to give only 3 wishes and make others very hard to get. I would prefer to give a single wish for release.
Three wishes are traditional.
And there’s no point in setting /everything/ up now: this is a nomic.
And who says releasing the Djinni is easy?
An ambiguity: ‘unless that Adventurer caused the Djinni to enter the Lamp’ might trigger if the Adventurer has ever caused the Djinni to enter the lamp, while unless I miss my guess the exemption is meant to prevent people from putting the Djinni into the Lamp and immediately getting him out again to farm wishes. (I can’t vote yet, but when I unidle I’ll vote against, in favor of one with a similar clause reading “unless that Adventurer was the last to cause the Djinni to enter the Lamp”).
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
I’d rather leave this up to Wak.
Klisz: