Extreme Scissors preventing you from doing Dynamic Actions is pretty scary.

(I know its kind of cheeky lol and likely shouldn’t have said that, sorry, but oh well. I don’t mind the punishing, it’s just the bureaucracy I dislike.)

  I’m generally for this but would like to see some kind of disincentive for cracking a promise to avoid bad or flimsy promises. Maybe something like “Cracking a Promise releases pent up magical energies and adds 1 mana to all other Pactmakers” or perhaps a boosted reward to those that have scorned a Promise which gets cracked?

Being out of the game for 4 days strongly disincentivizes breaking a promise enough for me.

Per Cuddlebeam’s comment on the potential formal functionality of this proposal - if a player is having Seizures, they can’t take dynastic actions, so they can’t take this action to remove the Promise.

I considered that but thought that, cf Prioritisation, this more restrictive condition (seizures due to promise N) overrides the less restrictive one (seizures).

Ah, perhaps.

It’s problem that it guts Scorn payouts: if the Seizured player acts before the Scorner(s) who have won their bets, they don’t get paid. Erasing a Promise should at least pay out anyone who was Scorning it.

Probably should, shouldn’t it. As long as this is in the front of the queue I may as well to unclog and resubmit.