Monday, April 03, 2023

Call for Judgment: Reorient The Blocks

Fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed 1 vote to 6 by Kevan.

Adminned at 04 Apr 2023 12:41:51 UTC

Enact “Stacks on Stacks” if it isn’t enacted already.  Remove all text after the second blockquote in the proposal “Block Chains” if it hasn’t passed, or remove the second instance of the material “Rebar” in the table of building materials if it has passed.  Change all instances of “WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW” to “18 blocks of Wood”.  Uphold all Build actions taken before this CfJ was posted.

This seems like too important of a fix(es) to keep in the proposal line.  Personally I think that Josh is wrong in his interpretation, but we may as well clear any ambiguity now.

Comments

Josh: he/they

03-04-2023 11:24:47 UTC

Might want to consider the second clause in light of a possible world where Block Chains has already been enacted.

Lulu: she/her

03-04-2023 11:28:30 UTC

done

Lulu: she/her

03-04-2023 11:41:38 UTC

Oh, just realized you could use the same argument to say that “WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW” is actually only one item long, so I’ve went and fixed that too

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

03-04-2023 12:56:27 UTC

I haven’t seen this style of CfJ before. So if we vote to greencheck this, then the vote tally on Stacks on Stacks doesn’t matter, correct?

Josh: he/they

03-04-2023 13:03:06 UTC

Correct.

lendunistus: he/him

03-04-2023 15:23:19 UTC

for

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

03-04-2023 15:53:49 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

03-04-2023 17:42:32 UTC

Not convinced that this is urgent (Stacks on Stacks includes a step to tidy things up if we continue to follow the rule literally), or that Josh was wrong to interpret the rule in this way.

against

Also, saying to “uphold all Build actions” is presumably saying that any illegal actions taken while this CfJ was pending which claimed in some way to be a Build action would also be rubber-stamped as legal, whatever they were trying and failing to do. This could be bad.

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

03-04-2023 18:10:13 UTC

CoV against due to Kevan’s point about upholding illegal Build actions.

jjm3x3: he/him

03-04-2023 18:45:59 UTC

I would like to point out that I don’t think Stacks On Stacks totally fixes what we have got going, however I agree with Kevan’s other points and something about this doesn’t feel right. against

Brendan: he/him

03-04-2023 18:54:28 UTC

against

lendunistus: he/him

03-04-2023 19:08:30 UTC

CoV against

Habanero:

04-04-2023 02:12:58 UTC

against