Proposal: Representation has a risk
S-Ked by coppro. DBCS ON BEHALF OF Spitemaster. ~~Chronos Phaenon
Adminned at 05 Nov 2011 18:21:19 UTC
REPRESENTING: coppro
In today’s economy, uncertainty is too dangerous. Shareholders need a firm yes or no!
Amend the rule “Involuntary Representation Service” by appending:
Players Represented by a Proposal receive no SP from that Proposal if they vote DEFERENTIAL on that Proposal.
If the proposal at Counteract representation inflation! failed, and more than half of the EVCs on this proposal contain “And another thing” also append to “Involuntary Representation Service”:
If a Player Represented by a Proposal votes anything other than FOR on that Proposal, the author of that Proposal does not become eligible for any SP because of this rule for that Proposal.
Too often, people who don’t like a proposal are voting DEF because they don’t like it, but they don’t want to S/K it. This will cause them to vote FOR is they want SP. Also, it causes the author to consider carefully who is represented, as a DEF vote hurts him as well.
And another thing
. DEFERENTIAL votes aren’t valid right now, correct?
Spitemaster:
And another thing: EaV