Proposal: Resistance Redux
Times out and fails 1-7 -Larrytheturtle
Adminned at 15 Nov 2013 07:54:56 UTC
In the rule “Fight the Powerâ€, insert after the first paragraph:
Power may be freely traded between Oligarchs and between Oligarchs and the Despot. It is the responsibility of Oligarchs to ensure that the terms of such trades are adhered to.
Throughout the ruleset, change “assign an Oligarch†to “assign an Office-less Oligarchâ€.
Append to the rule “Officesâ€:
The Despot and all holders of Offices of Command or Authority, taken together, may be referred to as The Government.
Enact a new rule entitled “The Resistanceâ€:
Any Oligarch may, as a daily action, join the Resistance and change their Office to “Rebel†by paying 1 Power to The Resistance. Every Oligarch may freely give Power to The Resistance. The Resistance’s Power is tracked in a GNDT row labeled “Resistance†with all other columns empty.
If more than 1/3 of all Oligarchs, rounded down, are Rebels, then any Rebel may make a Resolution by spending 7 power and submitting a Proposal with a subject starting with “[Res]â€. No more than 2 Resolutions may be pending at a time, and all pending Resolutions may be failed at any time if the number of Seditious Rebels falls below the threshold stipulated above.
Resolutions are limited to:
* Distributing Power within the Resistance. Resolutions cannot create or destroy Power or affect the Power of non-Rebels.
* Imposing or altering a hierarchy or order within the Resistance. Resolutions cannot impair or enhance any Oligarch’s ability to vote on Votable Matters.Oligarchs who are not Rebels must pay 1 Power to The Resistance to vote on a Resolution, Oligarchs in the Government must pay 5 Power to The Resistance to vote on a Resolution, and the Despot must pay 15 Power to Veto a Resolution. In addition to the normal rules for Proposals, a Resolution may pass if at least 3/4 of all of the larger group of [Rebels or Seditious Oligarchs], rounded up, vote FOR it and there are more votes FOR it than AGAINST.
Now ignoring Seditiousness, explicitly limiting power, and making voting counts fairer.
Josh: he/they